back back to index press briefings
back back to Mandela page

Crossing Madiba cost Jordan his job

April 04, 1996


The firing of Pallo Jordan from his Cabinet post had more to do with clashes with the president than his performance on the job, writes Gaye Davis

Pallo Jordan was fired from Cabinet as a result of sharp differences with President Nelson Mandela and other senior African National Congress members - including a stand he took against the dilution of civil liberties and against interference in the broadcasting services.

It emerged this week that Jordan has clashed repeatedly with the president. Last year he was nearly dismissed after opposing proposals that the Constitution's Chapter of Rights be watered down to facilitate the police fight against crime.

It is understood he also angered Mandela by his refusal to take a "hands on" approach to the SABC. Mandela was apparently frustrated by the SABC's handling of the Afrikaans language issue - which he feared was proving a rallying point for the right wing and jeopardising the process of reconciliation and nation-building.

There has been widespread speculation that Thabo Mbeki was behind Jordan's axing. But Mandela said in Athlone at the weekend that the decision was his alone.

The Mail & Guardian has confirmed there was no consultation with senior party officials before the decision to get rid of Jordan was announced; ANC deputy secretary general Cheryl Carolus heard about it on the radio and secretary general Cyril Ramaphosa was told a few minutes before Jordan himself. The ANC had already had its last parliamentary caucus of the session. The matter was not discussed at the last NEC meeting of the ANC.

Jordan was refusing to discuss his dismissal, other than to label as "media speculation" reports that he had been offered - and turned down - an ambassadorship to Japan. He said would remain in politics. "There is lots of room on the back benches," he said. However, he was angered by his sacking and determined to make a comeback.

But other sources in the ANC attributed his firing to a series of differences with Mandela. In addition to the broadcasting and civil rights issues, Jordan was being criticised in the ANC hierarchy for his approach to the privatisation of Telkom. There was a general feeling the ANC was not providing leadership in privatising state assets and that Jordan appeared to be reluctant to tackle the unions.

Jordan also opposed President Mandela over his "Indian option" - a list of candidates he had drawn up for the ANC's national executive committee elections at the organisation's Bloemfontein conference in 1994. Jordan objected to the approach as undemocratic. Mandela's move was defeated and Jordan polled second place, after Bantu Holomisa.

There have also been differences between Jordan and Mbeki. Last year they had a dust-up over the one-hour slot Mbeki wanted for the government on the SABC. Jordan was openly disdainful of the notion. Questions were raised at the time as to why Mbeki felt the need for such an intervention when he had overall responsibility for the South African Communications Service, with a budget of R56- million a year.

It is understood they also clashed over government's economic growth and development strategy. Jordan had opposed the initiative not in principle, but because he questioned the wisdom of bringing a new concept to the Reconstruction and Development Programme at a time when the RDP had barely got off the ground.

Jordan's dismissal has shocked many in the ANC. He was described this week by colleagues as a man of integrity and great courage. As one put it: "Pallo brings to the ANC integrity and pluck. He will stand up and say what others don't have the guts to say. He might be wrong sometimes, but it's his honest opinion, not some power play. This is what we'll be losing from cabinet." Of the left, but not a member of the South African Communist Party; liked by organised labour, but not from Cosatu, his isolation from these power blocs seems to have made him vulnerable.

Jordan has always been clear in his mission to bring South Africa into the 21st-century as far as telecommunications is concerned. That has now been taken away from him. He has tried to defend South Africa from international pressures on open local markets that could have led to their being swamped by conglomerates in cosy strategic alliances. Jordan realised it wasn't possible to swim against the currents of globalisation, but saw a way of finessing it, using his White Paper to spell out a phased liberalisation of the market, giving South Africans the opportunity to build up their strength against inevitable opposition.

Jordan's firing is being interpreted as a warning to those who might "overstep the mark" in their criticism.

Mandela has no peers in the ANC leadership. While he is traditionally seen as first among equals, in terms of experience and stature Mandela towers above the rest.

There is concern in some quarters at least that this overwhelming dominance could set a dangerous precedent for successors to the presidency.

© Weekly Mail & Guardian




Editorial:
True to Mandela's values

April 12, 1996


The African National Congress and the ANC Youth League have taken it upon themselves to attack the Mail & Guardian over its coverage of the recent cabinet re-shuffle, in particular the apparent differences between President Nelson Mandela and Pallo Jordan which led to the dismissal of the former minister of posts, telecommunications and broadcasting.

To be charitable to the Youth League, its contribution to public debate on the issue is of the puerile standard we have come to expect from this collection of superannuated schoolboys. Its statement is reproduced elsewhere in this edition and is not worthy of further comment.

The statement from the ANC is more alarming. Not so much for its denial of the accuracy of our report - we stand by it and have been gratified by congratulations we have received from a number of ANC politicians - but by virtue of its charge that our reporting was "a shocking insult to the president". The phrase is intimidatory, suggesting we have committed a heinous act of lèse-majesté.

It should be said - even though we have said it before - that we are passionate admirers of the president. His has been the most significant individual contribution to the liberation of South Africa and its present stability. We are grateful to him, above all, for his part in the creation of a state based on the rule of law, the division of powers and respect for fundamental rights including that of freedom of speech. It is out of respect for that heritage that we, as members of what can rightly be described as the Fourth Estate in our country, are concerned to subject the three other Estates - the executive, the legislature and the judiciary - to close and critical examination.

Our respect for Mandela is such that, at times, we find it difficult to discharge that duty; to avoid being swept away by the tide of national and international adulation. It takes an act of will to remind ourselves of the dangers of personality cults and of the tendency of political parties which enjoy the certainty of power - even if it derives from the ballot box - to silence criticism.

To accuse us of "insulting the president" smacks of the days when John Vorster attempted to silence a Rand Daily Mail political correspondent by accusing him of asking "unpatriotic questions". The ANC has every right to challenge the accuracy of our reporting, to question our judgement and to ridicule our conclusions. There will always be a place for it to express such views in the columns of this newspaper. But any attempt to intimidate us will be met with a contempt born of a confidence that ours is the defence of Mandela's bequest to the nation and theirs is the betrayal of it.

© Weekly Mail & Guardian




How well did the Cabinet do this year
December 22, 1995


Cabinet members are assessed only on their performance in government - not on their party leadership or conduct outside Parliament (ie barging into live TV studios is not taken into account). They are rated on a scale of one to 10. Ten means they should have the job for life; one means they should be fired at dawn; five means they haven't achieved too much, but also haven't done much damage. (The figure in brackets is the rating we gave Cabinet members in April, when - with few exceptions - they had been in office for a year.) Compiled by Anton Harber

Name: Pallo Jordan
Title: Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism
Grade: B

He shot up in the ratings when he saved the Brento Blue butterfly from extinction, dropped back again when it was revealed that he was allowing the export of baboons and monkeys to a suspect French outfit for scientific experiments, but again redeemed himself with an innovative tourism plan that would save St Lucia once and for all from dune mining. His biggest fault is his too-low profile for a tourism minister, thrown into sharper relief by the obvious enthusiasm that his deputy - Peter Mokaba, shows for the portfolio (and for Jordan's job). After an apparent walk in the political wilderness, Jordan experienced a comeback towards the end of the year with several key papers for the ANC conference on non-racialism and the economy. His support in the party was illustrated by the fact that he finished third in the NEC elections.

Prognosis: A lot more will be heard of this brilliant if not very PR-conscious minister in the new year. The left needs a theorist of this calibre.

© Weekly Mail & Guardian



back back to index press briefings
back naar de Mandela pagina